• Home
  • Sitemap
  • Contact
  • Privacy

Extinct or Soon to be extinct

Extinct & soon to be extinct animal/species, very sad video.

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts

63 Responses to “Extinct or Soon to be extinct”

  • TR:

    I am saddened to see the disrespectful, uneducated, and plain ignorant comments regarding the state of the planet’s animals and outright contempt for them. We humans are the scourge, the malignant cancer that will ultimately be our own demise. Humans are the only species that kill their own in mass numbers. If we have such a superior intellect, why are raping and pushing the planet to the brink? The writing in on the wall, yet so many see it, but fail to read. I’m not a tree hugger, but I have lived throughout the world, and have seen first hand the, sometimes irreversible damage done by us. I have more respect for any animal than most humans; animals live a specific life without the vices, to mention a few, of corruption,  greed, and vanity. The loss of any species due to our hand leave an indelible stain on us. We really need to reset. 

  • Jenny Talwortz:

    Dont worry about Jeffy_Dalhmer Solomon, he will starve to death within the next 5 years along with the rest of the unprepared petroleum man human subspecies.

  • Connor:

    I was really sad when I saw this video, but all your comments saying “Some were ugly fucks” made me crack a smile.

  • ohmy
    what can i do to save these animals?

  • Pat:

    How do you have a list of endangered species and not mention mountain gorillas or wild bactrian camels or amur leopard (which only has 30-35  left in the wild)?????

  • CSC Is Gay:

    csc?!!! yOU MORONIC RETARD!!! HOW DARE U TALK BOUT BANGLADESH U ASSHOLE…MIND IT DAT ALL DA WEALTH U HAVE IN UR GODDAMN SHITHOLE WAS PLUNDERED 4RM US U HERMAPHRODITE….HAVE RESPECT ND GET A LYF WANKER…….LMAo!!!!

  • Fishtank:

    All you people that say “Extinction is fine just ignore it” are stupid. And I’m not one who usually calls people names. You who think that probably think that about insects, right… Well think of it this way.

    If all insects died then all the animals that feed on them would die. Then all the animals that feed on those animals would die. Ect. Ect Ect. All the way up to the primary consumers (The animals on the top of the food chain).

    If your still thinking poeple can servive at this piont than think of it this way. If
    all insects died then plants would not be able to reproduce which meens no new plants naturaly. And humanity is not advanced enouph to pollinate a whole planet (and may never be). Which meens no more plants (for the majority).

    So without plants and animals humans would be going through life eating cans of perserved food till we all died of either food piosoning, starvation, or carbonmonoxied piosoning (Suffication). And thats if insects died first. If some other section of the ecosystem died out first than everything I’ve stated would probably still happen but in a different order ending with this last paragraph.

    It should be noted that I am not an animal activist. At a certian piont these events will be at apiont of no return. And everybody should just get over the issue of “Human Supremecy”.

  • redneck:

    To the jackass that said rednecks with guns cause extinction, why dont you read a book, cause rednecks with guns are the people who founded this country. I have guns but I dont kill anything, and for you to through a blanket comment like that is like me saying all women are bitches or all men are assholes…..

  • I just have one thing to say. I find it wrong that when people kill animals and drive them to mass extinction everyone turns a blind eye. But when an animal kills a human we label it as a pest and threat and try to purge the world of it. I mean I understand some species of animals are(like the mosquito, wild pigs, pigeons, etc.), but other species have done nothing wrong besides look threatening, or nice in front of a fireplace, or kill a person for threatening it or it’s young. The fact that we destroy their natural habitat and kill them for sport and then get pissed when they fight back just is not right. I mean really? If I came into your house and shot your family so I could have a nice trophy to brag about to people or just call it “nature taking its course”, or even progress is not an excuse to me.

    I mean sure some of it is nature, but we contribute a lot to the extinction of species.

  • Dalas:

    csc5502 you are retarded. It is not interfering with nature to save these animals since it is us that is killing them off… not natural order. We are cleaning up our own mess by trying to save them. We hunted them to extinction, we built copious and useless amounds of malls to destroy their habitat. It is not natures course that most of them are extinct or going to be. the only animals that do not owe their extinction to us pre-date us into the prehistoric era.

  • jbdean:

    @Raine343 Sorry, but you’re a total a$$. First, there is no such thing as a pest when it comes to a living creature (other than a lot of humans who have the brains to know better but prefer to live on their greed and selfishness instead)! And second, the poster titled the blog “Extinct & soon to be extinct animal/species,” so stop trying to sound intelligent and know-it-all because you failed miserably. All life has the right to live, thrive and not be killed off or dwindled down due to man’s hunting them to extinction or encroaching on their land and forcing them into areas where they cannot find food or polluting their space so that their food sources leave and they starve to death (the Alaskan Polar Bear, for example). When I think that my now 3 year old grandson will never see many of the animals I took for granted as always being here when I was young, it breaks my heart. I never dreamed that a breed of horse, a rhino, tiger or polar bear could end up no longer existing in the wild in my lifetime. If we don’t all change very soon, the only animals left to put in zoos will be humans. 

  • jbdean:

    @Dalas YOU ROCK! Tell ‘em how it is! And with us being the “intelligent” species, why can’t part of natural selection include our helping even if we might not be the cause of a certain animal’s demise? Our intelligence should be put to good, not bad … saving, not destroying!

Leave a Reply

Personal Menu
    Log In

    Ads
    Banners
    Funny Animals | StrangeNature.com